$5,200,000.00+ Settlement Before Trial

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: راننده و کارفرما

خلاصه:
مشتری ما وقتی به عقب راننده دیگری بود که به عنوان پیمانکار مستقل استخدام شده بود با چراغ قرمز متوقف شد. در نتیجه ، مشتری ما دچار آسیب های متعدد و متحمل هزینه های پزشکی بیش از 150،000.00 دلار شد.

After successfully battling numerous law firms, we were able to secure a settlement of more than $5,200,000.00 right before trial.

$2,750,000.00 Recovered A Week Before Trial

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: Driver

خلاصه:
Our client was riding his bicycle when a Range Rover suddenly swerved into the bicycle lane and collided with our client’s rear wheel, ejecting him from his bicycle. As a result of the violent impact with the ground, our client suffered multiple injuries and incurred medical costs of more than $140,000.00.

After aggressively battling the opposing law firm for over 4 years, we successfully resolved the case for $2,750,000.00 one week before the jury trial despite their initial offer of $200,000 only 7 months earlier.

1،250،000.00 دلار بدون تشکیل دادخواست بازیابی شد

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: شرکت بیمه راننده با مسئولیت

خلاصه:
مشتری ما وقتی در حال عبور از خانه بود ، هنگام عبور از یک کامیون وانت Dodge با سرعت 30 مایل در ساعت از چراغ قرمز عبور کرد و با او برخورد کرد. مشتری ما بیهوش شد و به بیمارستان منتقل شد. در نتیجه ، مشتری ما دچار خونریزی مغزی شد ، هر دو پا و مچ دست خود را شکست.

بعد از اینکه ما با نامه تقاضای ما به شرکت بیمه راننده مسئولیت پذیر خدمت کردیم ، آنها بلافاصله با تلاش برای حل مسئله پاسخ دادند.

Soon afterwards, we recovered $1,250,000.00 for our client prior to filing a lawsuit.

$972,000.00 Jury Verdict After 9-Day Trial

نوع مورد: Insurance
حزب مخالف: Insurance Agent

خلاصه:
Our non-English speaking client applied for an insurance policy that would provide benefit payments until the age of 65 in the event of an injury that impacted his income. However, 5 years after being injured, our client suddenly discovered that the insurance agent had failed to inform him that the insurance policy only provided benefit payments for 5 years rather than to age 65, which our client only discovered once the insurance company stopped making further payments after 5 years. As a result, our client was unable to receive approximately $240,000 of insurance benefits, which forced him to sell his business and incur various loans to pay for his family’s living expenses.

After a 9-day jury trial, 12 of the 12-jurors found that the insurance agent was liable for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, and awarded our client a total of $972,000.00 based upon $222,000 for the economic damages and $750,000 the mental and emotional distress our client suffered as a result of the insurance agent’s conduct.

Secured $1,100,00.00+ Debt & $7,500/Mo Payments

نوع مورد:  مشاور املاک
حزب مخالف: بدهکار ورشکستگی

خلاصه:
مشتریان ما بیش از 900،000.00 دلار به مالک دارایی وام داده اند. هنگامی که مالک دارایی پرداخت ماهانه موردنیاز خود را متوقف کرد ، موکلان ما مجبور شدند برای املاک تضمین بدهی ، مراحل سلب مالکیت را آغاز کنند. به امید متوقف کردن سلب مالکیت ، مالک دارایی ورشکستگی کرد.

We were able to successfully secure the debt in the amount of $1,100,000.00, and obtained an order granting our clients monthly payments of $7,500.00. The bankruptcy Court also ordered that the property must be sold within 7 months to repay our clients or they would be allowed to proceed with foreclosure.

$430,000.00 Recovered For Injured Bicyclist

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: Truck Driver

خلاصه:
Our client was riding her bicycle when an oversized truck turned into her, causing her to eject from her bicycle. As a result, our client suffered multiple injuries, including a broken leg.

After successfully battling the truck driver’s insurance company, we were able to secure a settlement of approximately $430,000.00 right before trial.

$430,000.00 Recovered Without Filing A Lawsuit

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: Drunk Driver’s Insurance Company

خلاصه:
Our clients were driving home when a drunk driver suddenly swerved into their lane from oncoming traffic and collided directly with their car. Our clients were knocked unconscious and the drunk driver was fatally injured. As a result, our clients incurred approximately $50,000 of medical treatment for the various injuries they suffered to their heads, necks, and backs.

After significant back-and-forth with the drunk driver’s insurance company, they ultimately agreed to pay our clients a total of $430,000.00 prior to filing a lawsuit.

$295,000.00+ Settlement Prior to Trial

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: Driver & Client’s Insurance

خلاصه:
Our client was a passenger in a car she ordered for a ride when the car was suddenly t-boned by another driver, causing our client to suffer multiple injuries.

After an aggressive lawsuit against the driver of the car in which our client was a passenger and the other driver, the other parties finally agreed to pay our client more than $295,000.00 to settle the lawsuit shortly before trial.

$260,000.00+ Recovered For Wrongful Termination

نوع مورد:  استخدام
حزب مخالف: کارفرما

خلاصه:
Our client was misclassified as an independent contractor despite being treated as an employee throughout the course of his employment. Once our client notified his employer that he was misclassified and requested to be properly classified as an employee, his employer immediately terminated him claiming that his termination was due to of loss of business income caused by COVID-19.

After nearly two years of aggressively litigating the case, the employer finally offered to settle the case for over $260,000.00.

$250,000.00 Recovered Prior To Filing A Lawsuit

نوع مورد: صدمه شخصی
حزب مخالف: Driver & Client’s Insurance

خلاصه:
Our client suffered a fracture to her heel of her foot after being t-boned by another vehicle exiting a shopping center. While we were able to immediately settle the case with the other driver, his insurance policy limits were only $50,000.00. Thankfully, our client’s own insurance policy included Under Insured Motorist coverage.

As a result, we were able to recover the policy limits from the other driver’s insurance as well as the policy limits from our client’s own insurance, for a total of $250,000.00.

200،000.00 $ + قضاوت برای اقدامات غیرقانونی کار

نوع مورد:  استخدام
حزب مخالف: کارفرما

خلاصه:
مشتری ما بیش از یک سال در یک "فروشگاه عرق" کار کرده بود ، جایی که به طور مرتب موظف بود بیش از 70 ساعت کار کند. اغلب بیش از 24 ساعت مستقیم و بدون هیچ استراحت یا استراحت غذا کار می کنند. کارفرمایان مرتباً از جمله مشتری ما سوء استفاده روانی و کلامی را به کارمندان خود وارد می کنند.

We filed a lawsuit on behalf of our client alleging numerous employment violations, including failure to pay wages, withholding earnings, failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and other wage and hour violations. We secured a judgment in our client’s favor, against all defendants, for more than $200,000.00.

$145,000.00+ Lien Secured & Bankruptcy Dismissed

نوع مورد:  مشاور املاک
حزب مخالف: بدهکار ورشکستگی

خلاصه:
مشتری ما بیش از 145،000.00 دلار بدهی برای وام به یک مالک ملک ، که توسط یک وثیقه در اموال تأمین شده است ، بدهکار بود. به منظور اجتناب از بازپرداخت مشتری ، صاحب املاک فصل 13 ورشکستگی را تشکیل داد و از به رسمیت شناختن بدهی تضمین شده خودداری کرد.

سپس ، به امید اجتناب از وثیقه موکل ما ، مالک املاک اقدام به مخالفت با ورشکستگی خود کرد. در پاسخ ، ما با موفقیت استدلال كردیم كه بدهی تضمین شده است و باید در برنامه فصل 13 صاحب ملك درج شود. از آنجا که مالک املاک نتوانسته است یک طرح فصل 13 را که شامل ادعای مطمئن مشتری ما است ، ارائه دهد ، دادگاه ما را به عزل ورشکستگی ، از جمله اقدامات مخالف وی ، اعطا کرد.

$100,000.00 Settlement For Illegal Apartment Complex

نوع مورد: مشاور املاک
حزب مخالف: Landlord

خلاصه:
Our clients were tenants in a single family home where the landlord was not responding to their requests to complete simple repairs. Instead, the landlord began harassing the tenants in hopes of convincing them to voluntarily vacate the home. After we were retained to help, we discovered that the landlord had illegally converted the single family home into a quasi-apartment complex without having obtained the necessary permits as the landlord had added a kitchen and shower to each room.

After extensive back and forth with the landlord’s attorney, we were ultimately able to settle the matter for $100,000.00 prior to starting a lawsuit.

95،000.00 دلار برای اخراج مشکوک بازیابی شد

نوع مورد: مشاور املاک
حزب مخالف: خریدار به دنبال فروش سلب حق اقامه دعوی

خلاصه:
مشتری ما در یک ملک با قرارداد اجاره نامه مستاجر بود که پس از پرداخت اجاره به مدت چندین سال به وی اجازه خرید ملک را می داد. علی رغم اینکه مشتری ما هر ماه اجاره می پردازد ، صاحبخانه اصلی پرداخت وام را متوقف کرده و بدون اطلاع مشتری از ما ، این ملک اخراج شد. پس از سلب مالکیت ، خریدار جدید در طول شب وارد ملک شد و کلیه املاک شخصی مشتری ما را به خیابان منتقل کرد و قفل ها را تغییر داد ، بنابراین شروع به بازگرداندن ملک برای فروش کرد.

We immediately filed a lawsuit against the buyer, alleging several causes of action related to wrongful eviction. After we prevailed on the preliminary injunction allowing our client to return to the property (delaying the buyer’s plan for remodeling), the buyer quickly agreed to settle for $95,000.00.

در طی 2 هفته 75300.00 دلار بازیابی شد

نوع مورد: دادخواست تجاری و شرکتی
حزب مخالف: کسب و کار

خلاصه:
مشتری ما در ازای دریافت 20٪ حقوق سالانه کارمندان جدید ، خدمات استخدامی شغلی را به مشاغل ارائه می دهد. مشتری ما یک کارمند مستقر کرده بود که مشاغل آن را با حقوق سالانه 280،000.00 دلار استخدام می کردند که مشتری ما را به مبلغ 56،000.00 دلار حق می دهد.

The business avoided paying our client its fee for nearly an entire year, before our client decided to file a complaint. Within 2 weeks of us filing the complaint, the business agreed to settle the matter for $75,300.00.

60،000.00 دلار حل و فصل ظرف 2 ماه

نوع مورد: دادخواست تجاری و شرکتی
حزب مخالف: شرکت بیمه بازرگانی

خلاصه:
مشتری ما برای یک ساختمان تجاری که اخیراً خریداری شده بود ، که قصد بازسازی آن را داشت ، پوشش بیمه را بدست آورد. در حالی که مجوزهای بازسازی را دریافت می کرد ، کل ساختمان را به یک مستاجر واحد که در حال راه اندازی یک شرکت فناوری جدید بود که در حال ایجاد برنامه های تلفن همراه بود ، اجاره داد. گرچه مستاجر کل ساختمان را اجاره کرد ، اما از نظر جسمی فقط بخشی از آن را اشغال می کرد زیرا این شرکت نسبتاً جدید بود.

چند ماه بعد ، یک خط آبرسانی در ساختمان پشت سر گذاشت که باعث سیل و خسارت قابل توجهی به مشتری ما شد که حدود 43000 دلار برای تعمیر هزینه کرد. مشتری ما برای بازپرداخت هزینه های تعمیر ، مطالبه ای را به شرکت بیمه خود ارائه داد ، اما شرکت بیمه آن با ادعا مبنی بر حداقل 31٪ ساختمان طبق آنچه در بیمه نامه تصرف نشده است ، پوشش آن را رد کرد.

پس از آنکه مشتری ما را حفظ کرد ، ما در دادگاه ایالتی کالیفرنیا علیه شرکت بیمه دعوی دعوی کردیم ، به سه دلیل اقدام - از جمله (1) نقض وظایف پیمانکاری برای پرداخت یک مطالبه تحت پوشش. (2) نقض تعهد تحمیل شده از حسن نیت و برخورد منصفانه؛ و (3) نقض کد مشاغل و حرفه های کالیفرنیا بخش 17200 و متعاقب آن.

در پاسخ به دادخواست ، شرکت بیمه دادخواست را برای حذف پرونده از رسیدگی در دادگاه ایالتی به جای دادگاه فدرال ارائه داد. ما با تهاجم این مخالفت مخالفت کردیم و دادگاه با رد این حکم به نفع ما تصمیم گرفت.

Within a week after losing its motion, the insurance company settled the case for $60,000.00 (more than the original costs of repair).

40،000.00 $ تسویه حساب برای آپارتمان بدون مجوز

نوع مورد: صاحبخانه و مستاجر
حزب مخالف: Landlord

خلاصه:
For nearly 10 years, our client was living in an un-permitted apartment and paying approximately $1,100 of rent per month. After the landlord stopped responding to our client’s requests for repairs, she sought our assistance. We discovered her apartment was not permitted with the City of Los Angeles and was converted into an apartment by illegally dividing one apartment into two apartments.

We drafted a complaint against the landlord and, prior to filing the lawsuit, served a copy on the landlord and demanded our client be paid a relocation fee and return of previously paid rent.

Realizing the problems it would face if it resisted, the landlord settled the case for approximately $40,000.00 without us ever having to file the complaint.

با موفقیت لیز پندنز را از دارایی سرمایه گذاری بیرون کشید

نوع مورد: مشاور املاک
حزب مخالف: بدهکار / مالک قبلی دارایی

خلاصه:
Our client foreclosed on an investment property, after it lent approximately $500,000 to the previous owner and he failed to make any payments. Once our client started foreclosure proceedings, the previous owner filed a petition for bankruptcy as a strategy to stop our client from obtaining possession to the investment property. After we continued to seek relief from the bankruptcy court, the previous owner realized he would be unable to stop the foreclosure and dismissed his bankruptcy petition.

After foreclosing on the investment property, the previous owner falsely claimed there were individuals living in the investment property as another strategy to stop our client from obtaining possession. We then evicted all individuals supposedly living in the investment property by filing an unlawful detainer action.

Once our client regained possession and started to remodel the investment property to sell, the previous owner filed a lawsuit against our client by alleging fraud as a strategy to record a Lis Pendens on the investment property so to stop any potential sale of the investment property. We then filed a motion requesting the previous owner post a bond with the court to allow the recording of the Lis Pendens during the lawsuit, which the court granted by ordering the previous owner to post a bond of $400,000.00 within 30 days.

Once the previous owner was unable to post the $400,000.00 bond, the Lis Pendens was expunged, which allowed our client to sell the investment property.